` Landerholm, Memovich, Lansverk & Whitesides, P.S.
Landerholm, Memovich, Lansverk & Whitesides, P.S.
Attorneys at Law
Serving SW Washington & NW Oregon for over 50 years

Practice Areas
Attorneys
Articles & Analyses
Employment Opportunities
Pacific NW Sites

Home

New Tax Law Warrants Review of Personal Estate Planning

by Philip B. Janney

The Economic Growth and Tax Relief and Reconciliation Act of 2001 (the "Act") made substantial changes in the Internal Revenue Code as it effects estates and gifts. The purpose of this article is to discuss some of these changes and how personal estate planning may require modification in light of the changes.

One of the best publicized changes under the Act is the increase in the amount that can pass free of estate taxes, commonly referred to as the "estate tax exemption amount". Under the Act this amount increased to $1 million for 2002 and 2003. This means that taxpayers may transfer $1 million of assets free of estate tax. Transfers in excess of this amount are subject to estate tax. The estate tax exemption amount is scheduled to increase throughout the decade to a maximum of $3.5 million in 2009. In 2010 estate taxes will be repealed. In 2011 estates taxes return and the estate tax exemption amount will again be pegged at $1 million.

For the first time since 1976 the estate tax exemption amount and gift tax exemption amount are no longer unified. Beginning in 2002, the gift tax exemption amount increased to $1 million, meaning that a taxpayer could choose to make lifetime gifts of up to $1 million on a tax-free basis. By doing so the taxpayer is essentially choosing to use his or her estate tax exemption amount during lifetime instead of at death (or in a combination). However, beginning in 2004, the estate tax exemption amount increases to $1.5 million but the gift tax exemption amount remains at $1 million throughout the decade (even in 2010 when estate taxes are repealed).

Tax rates applicable to gifts and estates exceeding the taxpayer's exemption amounts are subject to a graduated rate structure. The Act reduced the highest tax rate from fifty-five percent to fifty percent and repealed a higher sixty percent rate applicable certain very large estates. The highest marginal tax rate will decrease throughout the decade to forty-five percent in 2009. However, the highest fifty-five percent rate returns in 2011.

An unlimited amount may be given to a spouse during lifetime or at death without the imposition of gift or estate taxes. This is referred to as the unlimited marital deduction. However, the unlimited marital deduction is not available to non-citizens. Also, certain types of gifts to qualified charitable organizations continue to be excluded for purposes of calculating a gift or estate tax.

It is important to remember that all assets passing at the time of death are subject to imposition of estate taxes. Estate taxes are not limited to assets passing under probate administration. Consequently, life insurance, retirement plan benefits, annuities, IRAs, jointly held accounts, and assets passing under a community property agreement or revocable living trust are all subject to estate tax. While most life insurance proceeds pass free of income tax, such proceeds are included in your estate for purposes of estate taxes; however, steps can be taken to avoid this result.


For married couples with estates that exceed (or are likely to exceed) the estate tax exemption amount, it is important to include appropriate provisions in wills or living trusts to preserve the estate tax exemption of the first spouse to die. If all assets pass to the survivor under the unlimited marital deduction, the decedent's estate tax exemption is lost. This will result in the children (or other beneficiaries) paying substantial additional estate tax. The changes required to avoid this extra tax liability are relatively simple, low cost and require few changes in how you own your assets.

Most estate attorneys, accountants and financial planners view the Act with only modest enthusiasm. "Smaller" estates are benefited because of the immediate increase in the estate tax exemption amount to $1 million from its previous $675,000. Larger estates are also benefited with the decreasing highest marginal tax bracket. However, all of these benefits are relatively short-lived under the Act. Increasing real estate prices, a recover in the stock market and growth of retirement plan benefits continue to add to the size of estates and push an increasing number of estates into the "taxable" category.

Furthermore, at the present time it appears that the state of Washington will continue to tax estates of less than $1 million. Like many other states, Washington imposes as an estate tax the amount that the Internal Revenue Code allows as an credit against the payment of any state death tax. This is referred to as the "state death tax credit". Thus, a portion of the tax that is otherwise payable to the United States Treasury is actually paid to the state of Washington.

Until 2001, Washington's estate tax amount allowed the use of all credits available under the Internal Revenue Code including the estate tax exemption amount. In essence, Washington allowed the same estate tax exemption amount that the Internal Revenue Code authorized to the estate. However, due primarily to budgetary constraints, Washington will not be raising the estate tax exemption amount in lock-step with the increase under the Internal Revenue Code under the Act. Under the law existing prior to the Act the estate tax exemption amount was scheduled to increase to $700,000 for 2002 and gradually increase to $1 million in 2006. At the present time it appears that Washington will be following this pre-Act law. Consequently, estate of persons dying in 2002 will be subject to estate tax in Washington if the value of their estate exceeds $700,000, not the new federal estate tax exemption amount of $1 million.

As indicated above, many married couples have included provisions in their wills or living trusts to fully utilized both spouse's estate tax exemption amounts. Depending on how this planning objective was accomplished, there may now be an estate tax payable on the death of the first spouse to die, not just on the survivor's death, as a consequence of the Washington's failure to recognize the increase in the estate tax exemption amount under federal law. To avoid this the will or living trust must be modified accordingly. You should have your will or living trust reviewed by your attorney to determine if this consequence was anticipated at the time the documents were drafted.


In another dramatic departure for prior law, the Act essentially eliminates the "step-up in basis rule" beginning in 2010. Historically, most forms of assets that had appreciated in value during the owner's life received a step-up in basis to fair market value as of the date of the owner's death. This allowed the recipients of the decedent's estate to avoid the payment of a capital gains tax that the owner would have had to pay if he or she sold the property prior to death. Beginning in 2010, the recipient's of property for a decedent will receive be required to retain the owner's basis in the property.

However, the Act does allow a limited basis step-up in the amount of $1.3 million of appreciation. This basis step-up is allocated among the property of the estate in the discretion of the estate's executor or trustee. If the decedent is survived by a spouse, the basis step-up in allowed to the extent of $3 million of appreciation; however, qualifying for the additional amount allowed to a spouse may be complicated in many cases.

Certain transfers to grandchildren and other beneficiaries when the decedent or donor "skips" a generation are subject to an additional tax called the generation skipping transfer tax (GSTT). The purpose of the GSTT is to tax transfers that skip generations because the assets will not be included in the estate of the skipped generation, such as children. Most commonly this occurs when a grandparent makes substantial gifts to a grandchild. The highest marginal estate tax rate applies to GSTT transfers. However, there are several techniques available to avoid the application of GSTT. In addition, every donor has a $1 million exemption that may be allocated during lifetime, at death or a combination. Under a 1997 law this exemption was be indexed to inflation, rounded to the nearest $10,000 and now stands at $1,100,000. Beginning in 2004 the GSTT exemption will be the same as the estate tax exemption amount. The GSTT rules are complicated, especially involving the allocation of the exemption, so you should consult your attorney or accountant before making large gifts, during lifetime or at death, when a generation is skipped.

As most people know, certain gifts of $10,000 per year are free of gift tax. This is referred to as the annual gift tax exclusion. This amount was indexed to inflation, rounded to the nearest $1000, and is now $11,000.

In addition to these changes in the federal tax law, there have been many improvements to the Washington state law dealing with estate planning. The probate code has been substantially modified to allow for increased efficiency in the administration of a decedent's estate. The law affecting powers of attorney to handle a disabled or incapacitated person's financial affairs and health care has been improved as well. Your wills, trusts, power of attorney and other estate planning documents should be reviewed to ascertain whether modifications are prudent to take advantage of these and other changes in the law.

Overall, the Act, as it pertains to estate planning, has some benefits but also adds many complications and a substantial degree of uncertainty. Higher exemption amounts and decreased rates are beneficial to estates for only a short period of time. Estate plans will need to be reviewed more frequently to determine if modifications are necessary in order to take full advantage of the benefits under the law. Clients and their professional advisors should discuss these and other changes under the Act to determine how each individual's estate plan is affected.

©Copyright 2003, Landerholm, Memovich, Lansverk & Whitesides, P.S.